When to Fine-Tune: The Decision Framework
Should you fine-tune at all? A structured decision framework for prompt engineering vs RAG vs fine-tuning.
Last updated
When to Fine-Tune: The Decision Framework
Fine-tuning is the last tool you should reach for, not the first. The optimization hierarchy, the three questions that settle it, and the honest defaults — so you spend weeks of engineering only when the cheaper levers are genuinely exhausted.
“Should we fine-tune?” is the most common fine-tuning question, and the right answer is usually no. Fine-tuning changes model weights — it is the most powerful, most expensive, least reversible, and slowest-to-iterate option on the table. Almost every problem people reach for it to solve is actually a prompt problem (behavior) or a knowledge problem (facts), and both have cheaper, faster answers. This section is the filter: climb the optimization hierarchy and only fine-tune when the rungs below it have run out. The other five sections in this part are the how; this one is the whether.
Related
More in LLM & Agentic
LLM Lifecycle
PreviewComplete lifecycle of large language models from pre-training through fine-tuning, RLHF, and deployment — with architecture diagrams and production considerations.
How LLMs Call Tools
PreviewHow LLMs use function calling and tool use — the mechanics behind tool-calling agents, from prompt engineering to structured output.
LoRA, QLoRA & PEFT Methods
PreviewHow LoRA works inside transformer layers, QLoRA for memory-efficient training, and the full PEFT method comparison with code examples.
Knowledge Distillation: Large to Small
PreviewTrain a small, fast model to mimic a large teacher — economics, pipeline, and quality filters for production distillation.
Get full access to all 87+ sections with code examples, diagrams, and interactive animations.
Unlock Premium